Chinese and Dutch mathematics teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Teachers’ beliefs are expected to have impact on the implementation of inquiry-based learning (IBL) in mathematics education. Moreover, Chinese and Dutch teaching cultures in mathematics seem to be very different. This paper presents results from semi-structured interviews with 30 Chinese and 19 Dutch mathematics teachers’ beliefs about IBL. Statements were connected to main codes and ranked for each country. Dutch teachers focused on students’ taking responsibility in IBL while Chinese teachers put extra emphasis on teacher guidance, they also talked about student discussion and collaboration. Chinese teachers paid attention to the benefits of IBL on mathematical thinking while Dutch teachers to the benefits on mastery and appliance of knowledge. In addition to the lack of time and suitable tasks as difficulties, Chinese teachers also mentioned students’ lack of motivation and performance, while Dutch teachers mentioned the demands and openness of IBL.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education
EditorsU.T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. Veldhuis
Place of PublicationUtrecht, the Netherlands
PublisherFreudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME
Pages3913-3920
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)978-90-73346-75-8
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • mathematics education
  • inquiry-based learning
  • comparative study
  • teacher beliefs
  • lower-secondary education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chinese and Dutch mathematics teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this