Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Chimpanzees are not more aggressive than bonobos but target sexes differently

  • University of Antwerp
  • Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The long-standing view that bonobos (Pan paniscus) are peaceful while chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) are aggressive has shaped our understanding of primate and human social evolution. However, recent observations from the wild challenge this dichotomy, warranting standardized comparative analyses of aggression in the Pan species. Here, we examined aggressive interactions across 22 zoo-housed groups of chimpanzees (N = 9 groups, 101 individuals) and bonobos (N = 13 groups, 88 individuals) using Bayesian social network analysis. We find no species differences in overall or contact aggression rates, accounting for group size and sex ratio. However, aggression patterns diverge by sex: Bonobos exhibit higher female-to-male aggression, while chimpanzees show the reverse. Notably, absolute aggression rates varied substantially between groups within each species, reinforcing recent evidence on group-specific social structures in Pan. These findings challenge the traditional aggression dichotomy between bonobos and chimpanzees and provide insights into the evolutionary dynamics of social conflict strategies in great apes, including humans.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbereadz2433
Pages (from-to)eadz2433
JournalScience advances
Volume12
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 the Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. no claim to original U.S. Government Works. distributed under a creative commons Attribution license 4.0 (cc BY).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chimpanzees are not more aggressive than bonobos but target sexes differently'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this