Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Children and adults' intuitions of what people can believe

  • Joshua A. Confer*
  • , Hanna Schleihauf
  • , Jan M. Engelmann
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of California at Berkeley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Two preregistered studies tested how 5- to 6-year-olds, 7- to 8-year-olds, and adults judged the possibility of holding alternative beliefs (N = 240, 110 females, U.S. sample, mixed ethnicities, data collected from September 2020 through October 2021). In Study 1, children and adults thought people could not hold different beliefs when their initial beliefs were supported by evidence (but judged they could without this evidential constraint). In Study 2, children and adults thought people could not hold different beliefs when their initial beliefs were moral beliefs (but judged they could without this moral constraint). Young children viewed moral beliefs as more constrained than adults. These results suggest that young children already have sophisticated intuitions of the possibility of holding various beliefs and how certain beliefs are constrained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447-461
Number of pages15
JournalChild Development
Volume95
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Child Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Research in Child Development.

Funding

Jan Engelmann acknowledges support from the Jacobs Foundation.

Funders
Jacobs Foundation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Children and adults' intuitions of what people can believe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this