Abstract
Two preregistered studies tested how 5- to 6-year-olds, 7- to 8-year-olds, and adults judged the possibility of holding alternative beliefs (N = 240, 110 females, U.S. sample, mixed ethnicities, data collected from September 2020 through October 2021). In Study 1, children and adults thought people could not hold different beliefs when their initial beliefs were supported by evidence (but judged they could without this evidential constraint). In Study 2, children and adults thought people could not hold different beliefs when their initial beliefs were moral beliefs (but judged they could without this moral constraint). Young children viewed moral beliefs as more constrained than adults. These results suggest that young children already have sophisticated intuitions of the possibility of holding various beliefs and how certain beliefs are constrained.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 447-461 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Child Development |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Authors. Child Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Research in Child Development.
Funding
Jan Engelmann acknowledges support from the Jacobs Foundation.
| Funders |
|---|
| Jacobs Foundation |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Children and adults' intuitions of what people can believe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver