Characterizations and Classifications of Argumentative Entailments

Ofer Arieli, AnneMarie Borg, Christian Straßer

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this paper we provide a detailed analysis of the inference process induced by logical argumentation frameworks. The frameworks may be defined with respect to any propositional language

    and logic, different arguments that represent deductions in the logic, various support-based attack relations between arguments, and all the complete Dung-style semantics for the frameworks. We show that, ultimately, for characterizing the inference process with respect to a given framework, extension-based semantics may be divided into two types: single-extension and multiple-extension, which induce respective kinds of entailment relations. These entailments are further classified by the way they tolerate new information (nonmonotonicity-related properties) and maintain conflicts among arguments (inconsistency-related properties).
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
    Publisherijcai.org
    Pages52-62
    Number of pages11
    ISBN (Print)978-1-956792-99-7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2021
    Event18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning -
    Duration: 3 Jan 202112 Jan 2021

    Conference

    Conference18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
    Period3/01/2112/01/21

    Bibliographical note

    DBLP's bibliographic metadata records provided through http://dblp.org/search/publ/api are distributed under a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. Although the bibliographic metadata records are provided consistent with CC0 1.0 Dedication, the content described by the metadata records is not. Content may be subject to copyright, rights of privacy, rights of publicity and other restrictions.

    Keywords

    • Argumentation
    • Inconsistency- and exception tolerant reasoning
    • paraconsistent logics
    • Commonsense reasoning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Characterizations and Classifications of Argumentative Entailments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this