Cesar-therapie tijdelijk effectiever dan standaardbehandeling door de huisarts bij patiënten met chronische aspecifieke lage rugklachten: Gerandomiseerd, gecontroleerd en geblindeerd onderzoek met 1 jaar follow-up

Translated title of the contribution: Cesar therapy is temporarily more effective than a standard treatment from the general practitioner in patients with chronic aspecific lower back pain; randomized, controlled and blinded study with a I year follow-up

V.H. Hildebrandt, K.I. Roper, R. Van den Berg, M. Douwes, S.G. Van den Heuvel, S. Van Buuren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective. To determine the effectiveness of a special form of exercise therapy ('Cesar therapy') on self reported recovery and improvement of posture amongst patients with chronic aspecific lower back pain. Design. Prospective randomized controlled and blinded investigation. Method. After informed consent had been obtained, patients with chronic aspecific lower back pain were given, on a randomized basis, either an exercise therapy (experimental group, n = 112) or a standard treatment by their general practitioner (control group, n = 110). Outcome measures were self reported recovery of back pain and improvement of posture (thoracic and lumbar spine, pelvis). Self reported recovery was determined by means of a dichotomized 7-point scale (questionnaire). Posture was measured qualitatively by a panel of 11 Cesar therapists (blinded) and quantitatively by an optical-electronic posture recording system (Vicon). Measurements were taken at baseline (pre-randomization) and at 3, 6 and 12 months after randomization. Results. Three months after randomization, patients who were treated according to Cesar therapy, reported an improvement in their back symptoms (8o%) significantly more often than the control group (47%). In both groups, however, only small improvements in posture were found. The judgement of the Cesar panel exhibited a significant difference between the two groups, with respect to the spine, in favour of Cesar therapy. Differences between the groups were still present 6 months after randomization, but could no longer be detected at 12 months after randomization. Conclusion. Cesar therapy was significantly more effective than standard treatment among patients with chronic lower back pain for a period of 6 months after randomization.
Translated title of the contributionCesar therapy is temporarily more effective than a standard treatment from the general practitioner in patients with chronic aspecific lower back pain; randomized, controlled and blinded study with a I year follow-up
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)2258-2264
Number of pages7
JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
Volume144
Issue number47
Publication statusPublished - 18 Nov 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • article
  • body position
  • clinical practice
  • clinical trial
  • controlled clinical trial
  • controlled study
  • double blind procedure
  • human
  • intermethod comparison
  • kinesiotherapy
  • low back pain
  • major clinical study
  • randomized controlled trial
  • self report
  • treatment outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cesar therapy is temporarily more effective than a standard treatment from the general practitioner in patients with chronic aspecific lower back pain; randomized, controlled and blinded study with a I year follow-up: Gerandomiseerd, gecontroleerd en geblindeerd onderzoek met 1 jaar follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this