Can bryophyte groups increase functional resolution in tundra ecosystems?

Signe Lett, Ingibjörg Svala Jónsdóttir, Antoine Becker-scarpitta, Casper T. Christiansen, Heinjo During, Flemming Ekelund, Greg H.r. Henry, Simone Lang, Anders Michelsen, Kathrin Rousk, Juha Alatalo, Katlyn Rose Betway, Sara Busca, Terry Callaghan, Michele Carbognani, Elisabeth J. Cooper, Johannes H. C. Cornelissen, Ellen Dorrepaal, Dagmar Egelkraut, Tatiana G. ElumeevaSiri V. Haugum, Robert D. Hollister, Annika K. Jägerbrand, Frida Keuper, Kari Klanderud, Esther Lévesque, Xin Liu, Jeremy May, Pascale Michel, Martin A Mörsdorf, Alessandro Petraglia, Christian Rixen, Bjorn Robroek, Agnieszka M. Rzepczynska, Nadia Soudzilovskaia, Anne Tolvanen, Vigdis Vandvik, Igor Volkov, Irina Volkova, Kristel Van Zuijlen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The relative contribution of bryophytes to plant diversity, primary productivity, and ecosystem functioning increases towards colder climates. Bryophytes respond to environmental changes at the species level, but because bryophyte species are relatively difficult to identify, they are often lumped into one functional group. Consequently, bryophyte function remains poorly resolved. Here, we explore how higher resolution of bryophyte functional diversity can be encouraged and implemented in tundra ecological studies. We briefly review previous bryophyte functional classifications and the roles of bryophytes in tundra ecosystems and their susceptibility to environmental change. Based on shoot morphology and colony organization, we then propose twelve easily distinguishable bryophyte functional groups. To illustrate how bryophyte functional groups can help elucidate variation in bryophyte effects and responses, we compiled existing data on water holding capacity, a key bryophyte trait. Although plant functional groups can mask potentially high interspecific and intraspecific variability, we found better separation of bryophyte functional group means compared with previous grouping systems regarding water holding capacity. This suggests that our bryophyte functional groups truly represent variation in the functional roles of bryophytes in tundra ecosystems. Lastly, we provide recommendations to improve the monitoring of bryophyte community changes in tundra study sites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)609-637
JournalArctic Science
Volume8
Issue number3
Early online date30 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Keywords

  • Arctic–Alpine
  • environmental change
  • functional traits
  • mosses
  • water holding capacity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can bryophyte groups increase functional resolution in tundra ecosystems?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this