Bureaucracy to Postbureaucracy: The Consequences of Political Failures

M.E. Compton, Kenneth J. Meier

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionaryAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Pathologies inherent in democratic political systems have consequences for bureaucracy, and they need to be examined. Limited in time, resources, and expertise, elected officials turn to bureaucratic institutions to carry out policy goals but all too often give public agencies too little support or too few resources to implement them effectively. In response to the challenges imposed by politics, public agencies have sought organizational solutions. Bureaucracies facing shortages of material resources, clear goals, representation of minority interests, or public trust have in recent decades adopted less hierarchical structures, exploited networks and privatization, and taken a representative role. In other words, the evolution of postbureaucratic governance institutions is in part a consequence of political incentives. Efforts to diagnose and resolve many of the shortcomings attributed to bureaucracy therefore require an accounting of the political processes shaping the context in which public managers and bureaucrats operate.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationOxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Number of pages24
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017

    Keywords

    • bureaucracy
    • political control
    • public management
    • politics
    • networks

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bureaucracy to Postbureaucracy: The Consequences of Political Failures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this