Bringing the Law to Life: Judicial Operationalisation of International Human Rights Law in the Domestic Sphere

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter debates the role of the national courts in applying and interpreting human rights law by looking at how judges engage with this area of international human rights law. This chapter first examines the requirements under international law for States parties to implement human rights treaties and discusses the monist and dualist nature of national legal systems. However, the chapter's main feature is the author's comparative analysis of jurisprudence from the Netherlands and Australia, countries of historical and geographical significance to Indonesia that follow different legal systems (monist vs. dualist and civil vs. common law). The chapter claims that judiciaries play a key role in realising human rights domestically and provides grounds for reflection on how this may be done in Indonesia. Fraser argues that Indonesian courts are better situated to implement human rights than both their Dutch and Australian peers in the sense that there are fewer occasions requiring them to defer to parliament.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Human Rights and Local Courts
Subtitle of host publicationHuman Rights Interpretation in Indonesia
EditorsAksel Tømte, Eko Riyadi
PublisherRoutledge
Pages36-56
Number of pages21
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781040022795
ISBN (Print)9781032555959
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 selection and editorial matter, Aksel Tømte and Eko Riyadi. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Netherlands
  • courts
  • domestic implementation
  • human rights
  • national law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bringing the Law to Life: Judicial Operationalisation of International Human Rights Law in the Domestic Sphere'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this