Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Breaking Trends: Large Animal Models to Study Spindle Assembly and Chromosome Segregation in Human Oocytes

  • Utrecht University
  • University Medical Center Utrecht

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Human oocytes are extremely prone to chromosome segregation errors. Although the mouse model has been extremely helpful in the study of oocyte meiosis, recent research has highlighted several important differences between murine and human oocytes in the mechanisms regulating spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. These limitations have led researchers to look for alternative animal models that would more closely recapitulate human meiosis. Oocytes from large animals such as cows, pigs, sheep, and horses have proved to share several features with human oocytes making them a useful addition to studies on human oocyte meiosis. In particular, the length of meiosis, the mechanisms of microtubule nucleation, the oocyte size and the aneuploidy rate in large animal oocytes closely resemble their human counterpart. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms driving correct chromosome segregation in large animal oocytes can provide valuable information that can be translated to human meiosis.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCellular Architecture and Dynamics in Female Meiosis
EditorsBinyam Mogessie
PublisherSpringer
Pages139-160
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9783031971730
ISBN (Print)9783031971723
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Aug 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Keywords

  • Chromosome segregation
  • Large animals
  • Meiosis
  • Oocyte
  • Spindle

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breaking Trends: Large Animal Models to Study Spindle Assembly and Chromosome Segregation in Human Oocytes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this