‘Brain-Reading’ in Criminal Justice and Forensic Psychiatry: Towards an Integrative Legal-Ethical Approach

Sjors Ligthart, Tijs Kooijmans, Gerben Meynen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Whereas brain-reading technologies could, in principle, strengthen forensic psychiatric evaluations, deploying brain-reading in this context also raises fundamental, interwoven ethical and legal questions. Although both in ethics and in the law similar questions arise in this respect, the legal and ethical debates tend to be separated from each other. This chapter aims to provide some further direction on how ethics and the law could learn from each other in the debate on forensic brain-reading. We argue that although ethical analysis can be very informative for the law, we should be careful in extrapolating ethical arguments into the legal debate. Conversely, legal doctrines can—and should—sometimes inform ethics as well.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNeurolaw
Subtitle of host publicationAdvances in Neuroscience, Justice & Security
EditorsSjors Ligthart, Dave van Toor, Tijs Kooijmans, Thomas Douglas, Gerben Meynen
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages121-141
Number of pages21
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-030-69277-3
ISBN (Print)978-3-030-69276-6, 978-3-030-69279-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 May 2021

Publication series

NamePalgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
ISSN (Print)2946-5192
ISSN (Electronic)2946-5206

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Brain-Reading’ in Criminal Justice and Forensic Psychiatry: Towards an Integrative Legal-Ethical Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this