Abstract
Can public consultations reduce the blame attributed to elected representatives whose decisions end up backfiring? Using two pre-registered survey experiments fielded in the US, this chapter examines whether blame attribution and generation may be shaped by: (1) consultation characteristics, especially regarding whether or not representatives align their policies, either actively or passively, with constituent opinion; and (2) elected representative and constituent characteristics, especially regarding a representative's gender and constituents' gender attitudes. The results suggest that public consultations are indeed liable to decrease blame, just so long as constituent opinion is not explicitly opposed to the representative's decision. Active alignment with constituent opinion, however, does not appear to be a requirement for decreased blame-and effects related to gender are also largely absent. These findings are important for scholars seeking to better understand blame attribution and generation, clarifying how public consultations might help politicians to pre-empt blame by reducing clarity of responsibility.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Politics and Governance of Blame |
Editors | Matthew Flinders, Gergana Dimova, Markus Hinterleitner, R.A.W. Rhodes, R. Kent Weaver |
Place of Publication | Oxford |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Pages | 704-738 |
Number of pages | 35 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191998225 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-0-19-889638-8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Anthony Kevins and Barbara Vis (2024).
Keywords
- Blame attribution
- Blame generation
- Clarity of responsibility
- Gender
- Hostile sexism