Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation for Inflammatory Arthritis and Osteoarthritis Patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

  • M.B. Pedersen
  • , P. Thinggaard
  • , R. Geenen
  • , M.U. Rasmussen
  • , M. De Wit
  • , L. March
  • , P. Mease
  • , E. Choy
  • , P.G. Conaghan
  • , L. Simon
  • , A.F. Hansen
  • , S. Tarp
  • , B. Schiøttz-Christensen
  • , C.B. Juhl
  • , S.M. Nielsen
  • , K. Amris
  • , R. Christensen
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Spine Centre of Southern Denmark
  • The Parker Institute
  • Department of Oral Biochemistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Swedish Medical Center/Providence St Joseph Health and University of Washington
  • Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
  • University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre
  • SDG LLC
  • University Library of Southern Denmark
  • the Parker Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To assess the benefits and harms associated with biopsychosocial rehabilitation in patients with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Data were collected through electronic searches of Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases up to March 2019. Trials examining the effect of biopsychosocial rehabilitation in adults with inflammatory arthritis and/or OA were considered eligible, excluding rehabilitation adjunct to surgery. The primary outcome for benefit was pain and total withdrawals for harm. Results: Of the 27 trials meeting the eligibility criteria, 22 trials (3,750 participants) reported sufficient data to be included in the quantitative synthesis. For patient-reported outcome measures, biopsychosocial rehabilitation was slightly superior to control for pain relief (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.19 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) −0.31, –0.07]), had a small effect on patient global assessment score (SMD –0.13 [95% CI –0.26, –0.00]), with no apparent effect on health-related quality of life, fatigue, self-reported disability/physical function, mental well-being, and reduction in pain intensity ≥30%. Clinician-measured outcomes displayed a small effect on observed disability/physical function (SMD −0.34 [95% CI −0.57, −0.10]), a large effect on physician global assessment score (SMD −0.72 [95% CI −1.18, −0.26]), and no effect on inflammation. No difference in harms existed in terms of the number of withdrawals, adverse events, or serious adverse events. Conclusion: Biopsychosocial rehabilitation produces a significant but clinically small beneficial effect on patient-reported pain among patients with inflammatory arthritis and OA, with no difference in harm. Methodologic weaknesses were observed in the included trials, suggesting low-to-moderate confidence in the estimates of effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-436
Number of pages14
JournalArthritis care & research
Volume75
Issue number2
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Supported by a core grant from the Oak Foundation (OCAY-18-774-OFIL). Dr. Conaghan's work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American College of Rheumatology.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American College of Rheumatology.

Funding

Supported by a core grant from the Oak Foundation (OCAY-18-774-OFIL). Dr. Conaghan's work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre.

FundersFunder number
Oak FoundationOCAY-18-774-OFIL
NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research

    Keywords

    • Ankylosing-spondylitis
    • Educational-program
    • Findings tables
    • Global burden
    • Hip
    • Knee osteoarthritis
    • Management
    • Multidisciplinary team care
    • Outpatient care
    • Rheumatoid-arthritis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation for Inflammatory Arthritis and Osteoarthritis Patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this