TY - JOUR
T1 - BIOHAZ scientific opinion on the equivalence of an alternative heat treatment process of feathers and down
AU - EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
AU - Allende, Ana
AU - Alvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino
AU - Bortolaia, Valeria
AU - Bover-Cid, Sara
AU - Dohmen, Wietske
AU - Guillier, Laurent
AU - Herman, Lieve
AU - Jacxsens, Liesbeth
AU - Mughini-Gras, Lapo
AU - Nauta, Maarten
AU - Ottoson, Jakob
AU - Peixe, Luisa
AU - Perez-Rodriguez, Fernando
AU - Skandamis, Panagiotis
AU - Suffredini, Elisabetta
AU - Griffin, John
AU - Escámez, Pablo Fernández
AU - Baptista, Carolina
AU - Correia, Sandra
AU - De Cesare, Alessandra
N1 - © 2025 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - The European Commission requested EFSA to provide a scientific opinion on the equivalence between the heat treatment process of feathers and down with dry heat to a temperature of 100°C for 30 min and the treatment set up in Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens. To be considered at least equivalent to the methods in the legislation, the alternative method should be able to reduce the concentration of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg by at least 5 log 10 and the infectious titre of Anelloviridae and Circoviridae by at least 3 log 10. An extensive literature search (ELS) was conducted to identify studies in which the log 10 reduction or the D value of the indicators were determined after dry heating in matrices with low moisture/water activity. The ELS did not provide any study on the inactivation of E. faecalis by dry heating. For S. Senftenberg, there was no clear data demonstrating a 5 log 10 reduction. For Anelloviridae and Circoviridae there was limited evidence and only one study reported 1 log 10 reduction after 30 min at 120°C. Given the available data and sources of uncertainty, it is not possible to conclude on a 5 log 10 reduction of E. faecalis using the proposed method due to lack of evidence. Similarly, a comparable reduction of S. Senftenberg cannot be concluded due to conflicting evidence. For Anelloviridae and Circoviridae, it was not possible to conclude that a 3 log 10 reduction is achieved with the proposed method, as only one study on dry heat was retrieved, which did not demonstrate such a reduction. Therefore, based on data available to date, applying dry heat to feathers and down at 100°C for 30 min cannot be considered equivalent to the treatment specified in the Regulation, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens.
AB - The European Commission requested EFSA to provide a scientific opinion on the equivalence between the heat treatment process of feathers and down with dry heat to a temperature of 100°C for 30 min and the treatment set up in Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens. To be considered at least equivalent to the methods in the legislation, the alternative method should be able to reduce the concentration of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg by at least 5 log 10 and the infectious titre of Anelloviridae and Circoviridae by at least 3 log 10. An extensive literature search (ELS) was conducted to identify studies in which the log 10 reduction or the D value of the indicators were determined after dry heating in matrices with low moisture/water activity. The ELS did not provide any study on the inactivation of E. faecalis by dry heating. For S. Senftenberg, there was no clear data demonstrating a 5 log 10 reduction. For Anelloviridae and Circoviridae there was limited evidence and only one study reported 1 log 10 reduction after 30 min at 120°C. Given the available data and sources of uncertainty, it is not possible to conclude on a 5 log 10 reduction of E. faecalis using the proposed method due to lack of evidence. Similarly, a comparable reduction of S. Senftenberg cannot be concluded due to conflicting evidence. For Anelloviridae and Circoviridae, it was not possible to conclude that a 3 log 10 reduction is achieved with the proposed method, as only one study on dry heat was retrieved, which did not demonstrate such a reduction. Therefore, based on data available to date, applying dry heat to feathers and down at 100°C for 30 min cannot be considered equivalent to the treatment specified in the Regulation, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens.
KW - Anelloviridae
KW - Circoviridae
KW - Enterococcus faecalis
KW - Salmonella Senftenberg
KW - animal by-products
KW - down
KW - dry heat treatment
KW - feathers
KW - inactivation
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9270
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9270
M3 - Article
C2 - 40041608
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 23
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 3
M1 - e9270
ER -