TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond ‘Migrant Background’
T2 - How to Select Relevant, Social Justice Oriented, and Feasible Social Categories in Educational Research
AU - Vietze, Jana
AU - Moffitt, Ursula
AU - Schwarzenthal, Miriam
AU - Civitillo, Sauro
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Linda Juang, Prof. Dr. Maja K. Schachner, and the Department of Inclusive Education (University of Potsdam, Germany) for their vital support in the data collection and review of this manuscript.
Funding Information:
This study has been supported by a scholarship to Jana Vietze by the Foundation of German Business (Stiftung der Deutschen Wirtschaft).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Across continental Europe, educational research samples are often divided by ‘migrant background’, a binary variable criticized for masking participant heterogeneity and reinforcing exclusionary norms of belonging. This study endorses more meaningful, representative, and precise research by offering four guiding questions for selecting relevant, social justice oriented, and feasible social categories for collecting and analysing data in psychological and educational research. Using a preregistered empirical example, we first compare selected social categories (‘migrant background’, family heritage, religion, citizenship, cultural identification, and generation status) in their potential to reveal participant heterogeneity. Second, we investigate differences in means and relations between variables (discrimination experiences, perceived societal Islamophobia, and national identity) and academic motivation among 1335 adolescents in Germany (48% female, Mage = 14.69). Regression analyses and multigroup SEM revealed differential experiences with and implications of discrimination for academic motivation. Results highlight the need for a deliberate, transparent use of social categories to make discrimination visible and centre participants’ subjective experiences.
AB - Across continental Europe, educational research samples are often divided by ‘migrant background’, a binary variable criticized for masking participant heterogeneity and reinforcing exclusionary norms of belonging. This study endorses more meaningful, representative, and precise research by offering four guiding questions for selecting relevant, social justice oriented, and feasible social categories for collecting and analysing data in psychological and educational research. Using a preregistered empirical example, we first compare selected social categories (‘migrant background’, family heritage, religion, citizenship, cultural identification, and generation status) in their potential to reveal participant heterogeneity. Second, we investigate differences in means and relations between variables (discrimination experiences, perceived societal Islamophobia, and national identity) and academic motivation among 1335 adolescents in Germany (48% female, Mage = 14.69). Regression analyses and multigroup SEM revealed differential experiences with and implications of discrimination for academic motivation. Results highlight the need for a deliberate, transparent use of social categories to make discrimination visible and centre participants’ subjective experiences.
KW - Academic motivation
KW - Discrimination
KW - Labels
KW - Migrant background
KW - National identity
KW - Social categories
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126131505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10212-022-00611-2
DO - 10.1007/s10212-022-00611-2
M3 - Article
SN - 0256-2928
VL - 38
SP - 389
EP - 408
JO - European Journal of Psychology of Education
JF - European Journal of Psychology of Education
IS - 1
ER -