Better understanding disasters by better using history: Systematically using the historical record as one way to advance research into disasters

Bas van Bavel, Daniel Curtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper argues that the understanding of causes and effects of hazards and shocks could be furthered by making more explicit and systematic use of the historical record, that is, by using ‘the past’ as a laboratory to test hypotheses in a careful way. History lends itself towards this end because of the opportunity it offers to identify distinct and divergent social structures existing very close to one another on a regional level and the possibility this creates of making comparisons between societal responses to shocks spatially and chronologically. Furthermore, the basic richness of the historical record itself enables us to make a long-term reconstruction of the social, economic and cultural impact of hazards and shocks simply not possible in contemporary disaster studies material.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-169
Number of pages32
JournalInternational Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters
Volume34
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Institutions
  • History
  • Methodology
  • Comparative
  • Disasters

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Better understanding disasters by better using history: Systematically using the historical record as one way to advance research into disasters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this