Behind the ethnic-civic distinction: Public attitudes towards immigrants' political rights in the Netherlands

Maykel Verkuijten*, Borja Martinovic

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Public opinion research has sought to distinguish between ethnic and civic conceptions of citizenship and examined the differential associations of these conceptions with policy preferences in the realm of immigration. What has not been examined empirically is why exactly these conceptions are related to people's preferences. In two survey studies conducted among national samples of native Dutch we tested the proposition that the endorsement of ethnic citizenship is related to lower acceptance of Muslim immigrant rights (Study 1) and their political participation (Study 2) because of a weaker normative sense of common national belonging and higher adherence to autochthony (primo-occupancy) beliefs. In contrast, the endorsement of civic citizenship was expected to be associated with higher acceptance of Muslim immigrant rights and their political participation because of a stronger sense of common belonging and lower belief in autochthony. The findings of the two studies are similar and in support of these expectations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-44
Number of pages11
JournalSocial Science Research
Volume53
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2015

Keywords

  • Autochthony
  • Civic citizenship representations
  • Common dual belonging
  • Ethnic citizenship representations
  • Muslim immigrants
  • Public opinion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Behind the ethnic-civic distinction: Public attitudes towards immigrants' political rights in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this