Balancing divergence and convergence in transdisciplinary research teams

W.P.C. Boon, Maryse Chappin, Jaap Perenboom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Climate adaptation projects often involve joint knowledge production, including different stakeholders and disciplines. One of the main challenges of transdisciplinary research projects is to balance the convergence and divergence of epistemic contributions. We explore to what extent organisational embedding of project teams, input in the project, and project governance influence project performance in climate adaptation projects. Our results indicate that aligning incentive systems and lower partner diversity lead to higher effectiveness and satisfaction. Project size enhances effectiveness, but decreases satisfaction. Satisfaction is enhanced by committed project members. Furthermore, dealing with diverse partner sets and large teams is not eased by careful management in the course of the project. Careful balancing of divergence and convergence should be taken into account during the design stage of these projects. In the context of knowledge co-production for environmental challenges, project management should proactively consider project structure, required level of partner diversity and project size. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-68
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental Science & Policy
Volume40
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2014

Keywords

  • Climate adaptation
  • Co-production
  • Joint knowledge production
  • Project governance
  • Transdisciplinarity
  • adaptive environmental management
  • article
  • case study
  • climate change
  • comparative study
  • conceptual framework
  • embedding
  • goal attainment
  • knowledge
  • participatory management
  • priority journal
  • satisfaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing divergence and convergence in transdisciplinary research teams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this