TY - JOUR
T1 - Backlash to Climate Policy
AU - Patterson, James
N1 - Funding Information:
* This research was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement 949332). I am grateful for feedback on earlier versions of this article from Frank Biermann, as well as from Diarmuid Torney and Johannes Müller Gómez at the ECPR 2021 General Conference. The ideas in this article benefited from ongoing discussion with Ksenia Anisimova, Jasmin Logg-Scarvell, and Cille Kaiser. I am thankful to three anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback and to the current and former editors of Global Environmental Politics and managing editor Susan Altman for their support and guidance.
Funding Information:
This research was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement 949332). I am grateful for feedback on earlier versions of this article from Frank Biermann, as well as from Diarmuid Torney and Johannes Müller Gómez at the ECPR 2021 General Conference. The ideas in this article benefited from ongoing discussion with Ksenia Anisimova, Jasmin Logg-Scarvell, and Cille Kaiser. I am thankful to three anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback and to the current and former editors of Global Environmental Politics and managing editor Susan Altman for their support and guidance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. International (CC BY 4.0) license.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Hard climate policy (e.g., regulation, taxes/pricing, phaseouts) is needed to meet ambitious climate targets, but when such policy is introduced, it can sometimes trigger backlash. Backlash involves an abrupt and forceful negative reaction by a significant number of actors seeking to reverse a policy, often through extraordinary means that transgress established procedures and norms. Yet, explanations of policy backlash remain nascent and fragmented. I synthesize insights from within and beyond climate politics to argue that contested legitimacy is central to climate policy backlash, which provokes attempts toward delegitimation. I develop a conceptual pathway to explain the occurrence of climate policy backlash and generate hypotheses about how practices of delegitimation occur, and their effects. This contributes to explaining why backlash occurs, highlighting ideational factors alongside interests and institutions. Overall, I suggest the need for a contextually embedded approach to understanding the volatile dynamics of backlash, bringing political sociology into conversation with political economy.
AB - Hard climate policy (e.g., regulation, taxes/pricing, phaseouts) is needed to meet ambitious climate targets, but when such policy is introduced, it can sometimes trigger backlash. Backlash involves an abrupt and forceful negative reaction by a significant number of actors seeking to reverse a policy, often through extraordinary means that transgress established procedures and norms. Yet, explanations of policy backlash remain nascent and fragmented. I synthesize insights from within and beyond climate politics to argue that contested legitimacy is central to climate policy backlash, which provokes attempts toward delegitimation. I develop a conceptual pathway to explain the occurrence of climate policy backlash and generate hypotheses about how practices of delegitimation occur, and their effects. This contributes to explaining why backlash occurs, highlighting ideational factors alongside interests and institutions. Overall, I suggest the need for a contextually embedded approach to understanding the volatile dynamics of backlash, bringing political sociology into conversation with political economy.
KW - Resistance
KW - Authority
KW - Feedback
KW - Politics
KW - Legitimacy
KW - Varieties
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146938728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/glep_a_00684
DO - 10.1162/glep_a_00684
M3 - Article
SN - 1526-3800
VL - 23
SP - 68
EP - 90
JO - Global Environmental Politics
JF - Global Environmental Politics
IS - 1
ER -