Back to the Future: Implications for the Field of HRM of the Multistakeholder Perspective Proposed 30 Years Ago

Michael Beer*, Paul Boselie, Chris Brewster

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Thirty years on from the seminal works on human resource management (HRM) by Beer et al., we examine how the subject has developed. We offer a normative review, based on that model and critique the assumption that the business of HRM is solely to improve returns to owners and shareholders. We identify the importance of a wider view of stakeholders to practitioners and how academic studies on the periphery of HRM are beginning to adopt such a view. We argue that the HRM studies so far have given us much valuable learning but that the subject has now reached a point where we need to take a wider, more contextual, more multilayered approach founded on the long-term needs of all relevant stakeholders. The original Beer et al. model remains a valuable guide to the next 30 years of HRM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-438
Number of pages12
JournalHuman Resource Management
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015

Keywords

  • Context
  • Harvard approach
  • Human resource management
  • Michigan approach
  • Multistakeholder perspective

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Back to the Future: Implications for the Field of HRM of the Multistakeholder Perspective Proposed 30 Years Ago'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this