Back to the future: How economic history can gain more relevance by abandoning modernization thinking

Bas van Bavel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Economic history has built a solid scientific foundation over the past decades but runs a risk of becoming marginalized. This paper suggests various ways to enhance its academic and societal relevance. It proposes taking pressing societal issues as clear starting points and using history as a ‘laboratory’ to address them. To effectively do so, a sharper focus on the social and environmental contexts of economic development would be needed. This may be furthered by closer involvement in multidisciplinary teams, where economic historians would bring in the chronological dimension, making use of their historical skills. Relevance will also be increased by abandoning modernization thinking. This would encourage more openness to processes of contestation, reversal, and divergencies, and more fully using the research opportunities offered by periods further back in time and all across the globe, not because these are different from the ‘modern’, Western situation but because they are relevant as sources of knowledge in themselves – knowledge that may be vital in light of the grave challenges present societies are facing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)401-423
JournalEconomic History Review
Volume78
Issue number2
Early online date25 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). The Economic History Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Economic History Society.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voorWetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Spinoza Premium 2019

FundersFunder number
Nederlandse Organisatie voorWetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Spinoza Premium

    Keywords

    • environment
    • hazards
    • modernization
    • multidisciplinarity
    • societal relevance
    • wealth distribution
    • well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Back to the future: How economic history can gain more relevance by abandoning modernization thinking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this