Availability, affordability and stock-outs of commodities for the treatment of snakebite in kenya

Gaby Isabelle Ooms*, Janneke van Oirschot, Dorothy Okemo, Benjamin Waldmann, Eugene Erulu, Aukje K. Mantel-Teeuwisse, Hendrika A. van den Ham, Tim Reed

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Annually, about 2.7 million snakebite envenomings occur globally. Alongside antivenom, patients usually require additional care to treat envenoming symptoms and antivenom side effects. Efforts are underway to improve snakebite care, but evidence from the ground to inform this is scarce. This study, therefore, investigated the availability, affordability, and stock-outs of antivenom and commodities for supportive snakebite care in health facilities across Kenya.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This study used an adaptation of the standardised World Health Organization (WHO)/Health Action International methodology. Data on commodity availability, prices and stock-outs were collected in July-August 2020 from public (n = 85), private (n = 36), and private not-for-profit (n = 12) facilities in Kenya. Stock-outs were measured retrospectively for a twelve-month period, enabling a comparison of a pre-COVID-19 period to stock-outs during COVID-19. Affordability was calculated using the wage of a lowest-paid government worker (LPGW) and the impoverishment approach. Accessibility was assessed combining the WHO availability target (≥80%) and LPGW affordability (<1 day's wage) measures. Overall availability of snakebite commodities was low (43.0%). Antivenom was available at 44.7% of public- and 19.4% of private facilities. Stock-outs of any snakebite commodity were common in the public- (18.6%) and private (11.7%) sectors, and had worsened during COVID-19 (10.6% versus 17.0% public sector, 8.4% versus 11.7% private sector). Affordability was not an issue in the public sector, while in the private sector the median cost of one vial of antivenom was 14.4 days' wage for an LPGW. Five commodities in the public sector and two in the private sector were deemed accessible.

CONCLUSIONS: Access to snakebite care is problematic in Kenya and seemed to have worsened during COVID-19. To improve access, efforts should focus on ensuring availability at both lower- and higher-level facilities, and improving the supply chain to reduce stock-outs. Including antivenom into Universal Health Coverage benefits packages would further facilitate accessibility.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0009702
Pages (from-to)1-20
JournalPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Volume15
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
GO, JVO, DO, BW and TR were financiallsupported by the Lillian Lincoln Foundation and th Hennecke Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Ooms et al.

Funding

GO, JVO, DO, BW and TR were financiallsupported by the Lillian Lincoln Foundation and th Hennecke Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Availability, affordability and stock-outs of commodities for the treatment of snakebite in kenya'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this