Automation, Work and the Achievement Gap

John Danaher, Sven Nyholm*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Rapid advances in AI-based automation have led to a number of existential and economic concerns. In particular, as automating technologies develop enhanced competency, they seem to threaten the values associated with meaningful work. In this article, we focus on one such value: the value of achievement. We argue that achievement is a key part of what makes work meaningful and that advances in AI and automation give rise to a number achievement gaps in the workplace. This could limit people’s ability to participate in meaningful forms of work. Achievement gaps are interesting, in part, because they are the inverse of the (negative) responsibility gaps already widely discussed in the literature on AI ethics. Having described and explained the problem of achievement gaps, the article concludes by identifying four possible policy responses to the problem.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-237
Number of pages11
JournalAI and Ethics
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Automation
  • Achievement
  • Meaningful work
  • Artifcial intelligence
  • Responsibility gap
  • Autonomy
  • Mastery
  • Community

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Automation, Work and the Achievement Gap'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this