Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce

Noortje de Boer, Nadine Raaphorst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A dominant assumption in the street-level bureaucracy literature is that bureaucrats’ discretion is curtailed by automated systems. Drawing on survey and factual data (n = 549) from Dutch inspectors, we test the effect of automation on enforcement style and whether this can be explained by discretion-as-perceived. Our results show that automation (1) increases bureaucrats’ legal and accommodation style; (2) discretion-as-perceived does not mediate this effect; but (3) automation does decrease discretion-as-perceived. The main implication is that we do not find empirical evidence for curtailment and future research should move beyond discretion to understand effects of digital systems on bureaucrats’ behaviour.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-62
Number of pages21
JournalPublic Management Review
Volume25
Issue number1
Early online date7 Jun 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Street-level bureaucracy
  • automation
  • digitalization
  • discretion
  • enforcement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this