Abstract
A dominant assumption in the street-level bureaucracy literature is that bureaucrats’ discretion is curtailed by automated systems. Drawing on survey and factual data (n = 549) from Dutch inspectors, we test the effect of automation on enforcement style and whether this can be explained by discretion-as-perceived. Our results show that automation (1) increases bureaucrats’ legal and accommodation style; (2) discretion-as-perceived does not mediate this effect; but (3) automation does decrease discretion-as-perceived. The main implication is that we do not find empirical evidence for curtailment and future research should move beyond discretion to understand effects of digital systems on bureaucrats’ behaviour.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 42-62 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Public Management Review |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 7 Jun 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- Street-level bureaucracy
- automation
- digitalization
- discretion
- enforcement