TY - JOUR
T1 - Autobiographical memories become less vivid and emotional after eye movements
AU - van den Hout, M.
AU - Muris, P.
AU - Salemink, E.
AU - Kindt, M.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Tested whether eye movements during retrieval of emotional memories are followed by less vividness and less emotionality of future recollections; whether this effect is stronger than the effects of a control activity; whether the alleged effects of tapping and eye movements are stronger than a no-movement, control condition; and whether reductions in vividness and emotionality after eye movements (and finger tapping) are specific to negative memories or also occur in the case of positive memories. 60 17-22 yr olds recalled positive or negative memories and scored the vividness and emotionality of the recollections. Next, memories were recalled while the S was performing rapid eye movements, finger tapping, or not performing a dual task. They were asked to recall the event again and to rate its vividness and emotionality. Compared to finger tapping and the no-dual-task condition, recollections after eye movements made future recollections less vivid. After eye movements, but not after the other interventions, negative memories became less negative, and positive memories became less positive. The findings show that eye movements not only reduce vividness and emotionality of memories during the eye moving, but also affect future recollections, during which no eye movements are made.
AB - Tested whether eye movements during retrieval of emotional memories are followed by less vividness and less emotionality of future recollections; whether this effect is stronger than the effects of a control activity; whether the alleged effects of tapping and eye movements are stronger than a no-movement, control condition; and whether reductions in vividness and emotionality after eye movements (and finger tapping) are specific to negative memories or also occur in the case of positive memories. 60 17-22 yr olds recalled positive or negative memories and scored the vividness and emotionality of the recollections. Next, memories were recalled while the S was performing rapid eye movements, finger tapping, or not performing a dual task. They were asked to recall the event again and to rate its vividness and emotionality. Compared to finger tapping and the no-dual-task condition, recollections after eye movements made future recollections less vivid. After eye movements, but not after the other interventions, negative memories became less negative, and positive memories became less positive. The findings show that eye movements not only reduce vividness and emotionality of memories during the eye moving, but also affect future recollections, during which no eye movements are made.
U2 - 10.1348/014466501163571
DO - 10.1348/014466501163571
M3 - Article
SN - 0144-6657
VL - 40
SP - 121
EP - 130
JO - British Journal of Clinical Psychology
JF - British Journal of Clinical Psychology
IS - 2
ER -