Abstract
The British Food Standards Authority (FSA) was established in the aftermath of the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) crisis as a radical break with the old climate of secrecy in food safety regulation. This chapter studies in detail how the new organization tries to reinvent openness in a highly technical field by combining different ways of knowing and actively reaching out towards the media and its different publics. The struggle of the FSA shows how seemingly self-evident goals of a deliberative governance, like openness and transparency, can be paradoxical and complicated in practice; similarly its motto of "putting 'the' consumer first" turns out to be more complex than it might seem. It provides a case study of how an organization tries to become authoritative giving meaning to democratic accountability and deliberation while complying with a commitment to expert knowledge. It also shows how emotional moments can be key to break through institutional routines and establish a shift in thinking and a joint commitment to a new way of working. It narrates one of the most interesting examples of a deliberative regulation known to date.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
ISBN (Print) | 9780191713132, 9780199281671 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2010 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Audiences
- British politics
- BSE crisis
- Casting
- Communication
- Deliberation
- Emotion
- Food safety politics
- Legitimacy
- Media
- Openness
- Participation
- Transparency