Audit report: Teachers Stepping up Their Game in the Face of Extreme Statements: a Qualitative Analysis of Educational Friction When Teaching Sensitive Topics, in: S. Lozano Parra, The School as a Playground for Educational Friction: Understanding Democracy in Dutch Secondary Education, appendix.

David van Alten

Audit report: Teachers Stepping up Their Game in the Face of Extreme Statements: a Qualitative Analysis of Educational Friction When Teaching Sensitive Topics, in: S. Lozano Parra, The School as a Playground for Educational Friction: Understanding Democracy in Dutch Secondary Education, appendix.

Research output: Other contribution › Academic

Abstract

For this research, an independent auditor has been contacted and asked
to take the role as auditor, and examine the research process along
the three criteria mentioned above. David van Alten, part of the same
research group and fellow PromoDoc, but not connected to our research
in any way, was willing to be the auditor of the study. To construct the
audit procedure, we followed the work of Akkerman (et al, 2008), and
used Mesker’s report (2018) as guideline to further structure the audit
procedure. The procedure has seven stages, as is presented in Table 1.
Together these stages form the audit report, which will be summarized
down below

Original language	English
Type	Audit report
Media of output	Published article
Publisher	Utrecht University
Number of pages	163
Place of Publication	Utrecht
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Audit report: Teachers Stepping up Their Game in the Face of Extreme Statements: a Qualitative Analysis of Educational Friction When Teaching Sensitive Topics, in: S. Lozano Parra, The School as a Playground for Educational Friction: Understanding Democracy in Dutch Secondary Education, appendix.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@misc{445bffb6bff5415c91939dd4bd2d2a23,

title = "Audit report: Teachers Stepping up Their Game in the Face of Extreme Statements: a Qualitative Analysis of Educational Friction When Teaching Sensitive Topics, in: S. Lozano Parra, The School as a Playground for Educational Friction: Understanding Democracy in Dutch Secondary Education, appendix.",

abstract = "For this research, an independent auditor has been contacted and asked to take the role as auditor, and examine the research process along the three criteria mentioned above. David van Alten, part of the same research group and fellow PromoDoc, but not connected to our research in any way, was willing to be the auditor of the study. To construct the audit procedure, we followed the work of Akkerman (et al, 2008), and used Mesker{\textquoteright}s report (2018) as guideline to further structure the audit procedure. The procedure has seven stages, as is presented in Table 1. Together these stages form the audit report, which will be summarized down below",

author = "{van Alten}, David",

note = "part of published article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2145923",

year = "2022",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "English",

publisher = "Utrecht University",

type = "Other",

}

Audit report: Teachers Stepping up Their Game in the Face of Extreme Statements: a Qualitative Analysis of Educational Friction When Teaching Sensitive Topics, in: S. Lozano Parra, The School as a Playground for Educational Friction: Understanding Democracy in Dutch Secondary Education, appendix. / van Alten, David.
163 p. Utrecht: Utrecht University. 2022, Audit report.

Research output: Other contribution › Academic

TY - GEN

T1 - Audit report: Teachers Stepping up Their Game in the Face of Extreme Statements: a Qualitative Analysis of Educational Friction When Teaching Sensitive Topics, in: S. Lozano Parra, The School as a Playground for Educational Friction: Understanding Democracy in Dutch Secondary Education, appendix.

AU - van Alten, David

N1 - part of published article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2145923

PY - 2022/12/1

Y1 - 2022/12/1

N2 - For this research, an independent auditor has been contacted and asked to take the role as auditor, and examine the research process along the three criteria mentioned above. David van Alten, part of the same research group and fellow PromoDoc, but not connected to our research in any way, was willing to be the auditor of the study. To construct the audit procedure, we followed the work of Akkerman (et al, 2008), and used Mesker’s report (2018) as guideline to further structure the audit procedure. The procedure has seven stages, as is presented in Table 1. Together these stages form the audit report, which will be summarized down below

AB - For this research, an independent auditor has been contacted and asked to take the role as auditor, and examine the research process along the three criteria mentioned above. David van Alten, part of the same research group and fellow PromoDoc, but not connected to our research in any way, was willing to be the auditor of the study. To construct the audit procedure, we followed the work of Akkerman (et al, 2008), and used Mesker’s report (2018) as guideline to further structure the audit procedure. The procedure has seven stages, as is presented in Table 1. Together these stages form the audit report, which will be summarized down below

M3 - Other contribution

PB - Utrecht University

CY - Utrecht

ER -