Assessment of soil n-alkane δD and branched tetraether membrane lipid distributions as tools for paleoelevation reconstruction

F. Peterse, M.T.J. van der Meer, S. Schouten, G. Jia, J. Ossebaar, J. Blokker, J.S. Sinninghe Damsté

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

delta O-18 values of pedogenic minerals forming from soil water are commonly used to reconstruct paleoelevation. To circumvent some of the disadvantages of this method, soil n-alkane delta D values were recently proposed as a new tool to reconstruct elevation changes, after showing that soil n-alkane delta D values track the altitude effect on precipitation delta D variations (r(2)=0.73 along Mt. Gongga, China). To verify the suitability of soil n-alkane delta D values as a paleoelevation proxy we measured the delta D of soil n-alkanes along Mt. Kilimanjaro (Tanzania). At midslope, soil n-alkane delta D values are possibly influenced by the present precipitation belt, causing D-depletion in precipitation, and hence in the soil n-alkanes. Consequently, soil n-alkane delta D values do not linearly relate with altitude (r(2)=0.03), suggesting that, in this case, they can not serve as an unambiguous proxy to infer past elevation changes. In contrast, it was recently shown that the MBT/CBT temperature proxy, which is based on the distribution of branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether (GDGT) membrane lipids, is linearly related with MAT, and thus altitude (r(2)=0.77), at Mt. Kilimanjaro. This suggests that this proxy may be more suitable for paleoelevation reconstruction for this region. However, application of the MBT/CBT proxy on the altitude gradient along Mt. Gongga showed that, although the MBT/CBT-derived temperature lapse rate (-5.9 degrees C/1000 m) resembles the measured temperature lapse rate (-6.0 degrees C/1000 m), there is a relatively large degree of scatter (r(2)=0.55). Our results thus show that both proxies can be subject to relatively large uncertainties in their assessment of past elevation changes, but that a combination of the soil n-alkane delta D and MBT/CBT proxies can likely result in a more reliable assessment of paleoelevation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2799-2807
Number of pages9
JournalBiogeosciences
Volume6
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Funding

We thank Dirk Verschuren (University of Gent, Belgium) for logistic support and helpful discussions, and A. Hemp (University of Bayreuth, Germany) for hospitality and guidance during fieldwork in Tanzania. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments which improved this manuscript. This work was partially performed as part of the ESF Euroclimate project Challacea, financially supported by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). MvdM was funded by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), Earth and Life Sciences (ALW), through grant No. 818.07.022 This is publication number DW-2009-5002 of the Darwin Center for Biogeosciences, which partially funded this project.

FundersFunder number
Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
Earth and Life Sciences (ALW)818.07.022
Darwin Center for BiogeosciencesDW-2009-5002

    Keywords

    • Aardwetenschappen/Geologie/Geofysica
    • Geowetenschappen en aanverwante (milieu)wetenschappen

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of soil n-alkane δD and branched tetraether membrane lipid distributions as tools for paleoelevation reconstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this