TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of significant benefit for orphan medicinal products by European regulators may support subsequent relative effectiveness assessments by health technology assessment organizations
AU - Vreman, Rick A.
AU - de Ruijter, Angela S.
AU - Zawada, Anna
AU - Tafuri, Giovanni
AU - Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta
AU - O'Connor, Daniel
AU - Naumann-Winter, Frauke
AU - Wolter, Franziska
AU - Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
AU - Leufkens, Hubert G.M.
AU - Sidiropoulos, Iordanis
AU - Larsson, Kristina
AU - Goettsch, Wim G.
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - To maintain orphan drug status at the time of market authorization, orphan medicinal products (OMPs) need to be assessed for all criteria, including significant benefit, by the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Subsequently, health technology assessment (HTA) organizations evaluate the same OMPs in their relative effectiveness assessments (REAs). This review investigates the similarities and differences between the two frameworks for six HTA organizations, including the European Network for HTA. We discuss differences between both assessment frameworks within five domains (clinical evidence used, patient population, intervention, comparators, and outcome measures) for all drugs. Five illustrative cases studies were selected for a qualitative review.
AB - To maintain orphan drug status at the time of market authorization, orphan medicinal products (OMPs) need to be assessed for all criteria, including significant benefit, by the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Subsequently, health technology assessment (HTA) organizations evaluate the same OMPs in their relative effectiveness assessments (REAs). This review investigates the similarities and differences between the two frameworks for six HTA organizations, including the European Network for HTA. We discuss differences between both assessment frameworks within five domains (clinical evidence used, patient population, intervention, comparators, and outcome measures) for all drugs. Five illustrative cases studies were selected for a qualitative review.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085019469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.04.012
DO - 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.04.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 32344040
AN - SCOPUS:85085019469
SN - 1359-6446
VL - 25
SP - 1223
EP - 1231
JO - Drug Discovery Today
JF - Drug Discovery Today
IS - 7
ER -