Assessing the national red lists of European vascular plants: Disparities and implications

  • Peter Glasnović
  • , Edy Fantinato*
  • , Gabriella Buffa
  • , André Carapeto
  • , Snežana Dragićević
  • , Živa Fišer
  • , Michael Kiehn
  • , Tiiu Kull
  • , Marcin Klisz
  • , Udayangani Liu
  • , Martina Lužnik
  • , Detlev Metzing
  • , Anastasia Stefanaki
  • , Nina Lončarević
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The diversity of vascular plant taxa in Europe is threatened. National red lists are valuable biodiversity conservation tools that provide us with information on the proximity of a taxon to extinction. However, there are still differences in the methods and implementation of these assessments across European countries, indicating gaps in conservation efforts at national and regional levels. To address these disparities, we conducted a study in which we compiled data from the most recent national red lists of vascular plants in European countries, including some countries from the eastern part of the Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot. Our results confirm concerns that the conservation status of European vascular flora is not fully mapped. We also found that this knowledge is not evenly distributed across European regions. There were differences in the availability of red lists, the regularity of updates, and the implementation of assessment methods. Countries that assessed their entire flora had a higher proportion of threatened taxa than countries that assessed only a portion of the flora. This highlights the risk of overlooking the conservation status of less known taxa when assessments are limited to specific taxa. Financial capacity was found to be a critical factor influencing the extent of these shortcomings. Our study has shown that countries that assess their entire flora have, on average, higher national spending on environmental protection within their overall economies. This information is critical for developing effective biodiversity conservation strategies across Europe and for addressing the threats faced by vascular plants in the region.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number110568
    JournalBiological Conservation
    Volume293
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2024

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2024 The Author(s)

    Funding

    This article is based upon work from COST Action CA18201 - An Integrated Approach to Conservation of Threatened Plants for the 21st Century (ConservePlants) , supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) . This paper is based on results of activities developed by the WG3 - Filling the gaps in plant conservation. We greatly acknowledge all who helped us to gather the information: Karin Ahrne, Necmi Aksoy, Dalibor Ballian, Oz Barazani, Igor Borsic , Magda Boudagher, Guy Colling, Joana Cursach Segui, Cvetanka Cvetkovska, Laura Daco, Andreas Ensslin, Marianne Evju, Jozef Pal Frink, Sandrine Godefroid, Johan Gourvil, Marko-Tapio Hyva <spacing diaeresis> rinen, Rhea Kahale, Renata Kjushterevska, Elez Krasniqi, Sandro Lanfranco, Maja Lazarevic , Predrag Lazarevic , Conor Meade, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Tine Mlac, Jesper Moeslund, Taras Parpan, Dhimiter Peci, Theodora Petanidou, Radoslaw Puchalka, Valerijus Rasomavicius, Gabriela Romanciuc, Ieva Rurane, Murat Sarginci, Ole Seberg, Suzanne Sharrock, Jozef Sibik, Pete Stroh, Bostjan Surina, Katalin Szitar, Rannveig Thoroddsen, Ivaylo N. Tsvetkov, Philippine Vergeer, Petr Vit, Margareta Walczak.

    Funders
    European Cooperation in Science and Technology

      Keywords

      • Conservation gaps
      • Europe
      • Plant conservation
      • Red lists
      • Threatened taxa
      • Vascular plants

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the national red lists of European vascular plants: Disparities and implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this