Abstract
In sustainability transitions research, the deliberate destabilisation of socio-technical regimes is increasingly recognised as a central intervention point. Absent, however, are granular approaches for assessing whether regime destabilisation actually occurs in processes of systemic change. We propose to assess regime destabilisation through shifts in the institutionalisation of field logics. Methodologically, we employ Socio-Technical Configuration Analysis to map changes over time in the composition and alignment of institutional and technological concepts embedded in sectoral policy. Empirically, we assess the extent to which post-Brexit agricultural policy reform in the United Kingdom marks the destabilisation of an unsustainable regime. Assessing legislative debate transcripts, we find that the previously dominant regime is only partly destabilised, as pre-existing development trajectories along established configurations of field logics, policy goals and instruments remain. These findings support the validity of our conceptual approach. Moreover, they nuance expectations about large-scale policy change as windows of opportunity for regime shifts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 100810 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-25 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions |
Volume | 50 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024
Funding
This research is funded by a doctoral studies grant from the German Academic Scholarship Foundation. Giuseppe Feola is thankful for generous funding by the European Research Council (Starting Grant 802441 ) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Vidi Grant 016.Vidi.185.173 ). The authors would like to thank Heiner Schanz, Jonas Heiberg, Bernhard Truffer and the Cirus cluster at EAWAG, as well as the Chair Group of Environmental Governance at Freiburg University and the Sustainable Food Systems working group at Utrecht University, whose feedback and comments on previous drafts greatly improved this article. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their very thoughtful and constructive reviews. This research is funded by a doctoral studies grant from the German Academic Scholarship Foundation. Giuseppe Feola is thankful for generous funding by the European Research Council (Starting Grant 802441) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Vidi Grant 016.Vidi.185.173).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Bernhard Truffer | |
German Academic Scholarship Foundation | |
Heiner Schanz | |
Jonas Heiberg | |
European Research Council | 802441 |
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg | |
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | 016 |
Keywords
- Discourse
- Institutional logics
- Policy reform
- Regime destabilisation
- Socio-Technical Configuration Analysis
- Sustainability transitions