Abstract
In this paper two discussions between experts about Bayesian modellings of complex criminal cases are analysed on their argumentation structure. The usefulness of several recognised argument schemes is confirmed, two new schemes for interpretation arguments and for arguments from statistics are proposed, and an analysis is given of debates about the validity of arguments. From a practical point of view the case study yields insights into the design of support software for
discussions about Bayesian modellings of complex criminal cases.
discussions about Bayesian modellings of complex criminal cases.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2017: The Thirtieth Annual Conference. |
Editors | A.Z. Wyner, G. Casini |
Publisher | IOS Press |
Pages | 69-78 |
Number of pages | 10 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-61499-838-9 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-61499-837-2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Publication series
Name | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
---|---|
Publisher | IOS Press |
Volume | 302 |
ISSN (Print) | 0922-6389 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 1879-8314 |
Keywords
- Argument schemes
- reasoning about evidence
- Bayesian probability theory
- aurgumentation support