Arguing international law in the South China Sea disputes: the Haiyang Shiyou 981 and USS Lassen incidents and the Philippines v. China arbitration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article focuses on how international law is argued by the parties to the South China Sea disputes and in what context these legal arguments are presented. To this end, the article analyses three recent issues in the South China Sea: the incident involving the Haiyang Shiyou 981 drilling rig, which operated in a maritime area in dispute between Vietnam and China; the passage of the uss Lassen in the vicinity of Subi Reef, which is occupied by China; and the arbitration between the Philippines and China under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The article concludes that looking at what legal arguments are or are not made and in what broader context those arguments are placed can contribute to a better understanding of the role of international law in the South China Sea disputes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-241
JournalThe International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Arguing international law in the South China Sea disputes: the Haiyang Shiyou 981 and USS Lassen incidents and the Philippines v. China arbitration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this