@inproceedings{d8bd34bb6aa2459abfacd2931f2da404,
title = "Arguing about the existence of conflicts",
abstract = "In this paper we formalise a meta-argumentation framework as an ASPIC+ extension which enables reasoning about conflicts between formulae of the argumentation language. The result is a standard abstract argumentation framework that can be evaluated via grounded semantics.",
keywords = "ASPIC+, argumentation, meta-Argumentation",
author = "Giuseppe Pisano and Roberta Calegari and Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sartor",
note = "Funding Information: 1Research partially supported by the “CompuLaw” project, funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union{\textquoteright}s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 833647). 2Corresponding Author: Giuseppe Pisano; E-mail:
[email protected]. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "7",
doi = "10.3233/FAIA220160",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-64368-306-5",
series = " Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",
publisher = "IOS Press",
pages = "284--295",
editor = "Francesca Toni and Polberg, {Sylwia } and Booth, {Richard } and Caminada, {Martin } and Kido, {Hiroyuki }",
booktitle = "Computational Models of Argument",
address = "Netherlands",
}