Arguing about the existence of conflicts

Giuseppe Pisano; Roberta Calegari; Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor

doi:10.3233/FAIA220160

Arguing about the existence of conflicts

Giuseppe Pisano, Roberta Calegari, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor

European University Institute

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

In this paper we formalise a meta-argumentation framework as an ASPIC+ extension which enables reasoning about conflicts between formulae of the argumentation language. The result is a standard abstract argumentation framework that can be evaluated via grounded semantics.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Computational Models of Argument
Subtitle of host publication	Proceedings of COMMA 2022
Editors	Francesca Toni, Sylwia Polberg, Richard Booth, Martin Caminada, Hiroyuki Kido
Publisher	IOS Press
Pages	284-295
Number of pages	12
ISBN (Electronic)	978-1-64368-307-2
ISBN (Print)	978-1-64368-306-5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220160
Publication status	Published - 7 Sept 2022

Publication series

Name	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Publisher	IOS Press
Volume	353
ISSN (Print)	0922-6389
ISSN (Electronic)	1879-8314

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
1Research partially supported by the “CompuLaw” project, funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 833647). 2Corresponding Author: Giuseppe Pisano; E-mail: [email protected].

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.

Keywords

ASPIC+
argumentation
meta-Argumentation

Access to Document

10.3233/FAIA220160Licence: CC BY-NC

FAIA-353-FAIA220160Final published version, 461 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@inproceedings{d8bd34bb6aa2459abfacd2931f2da404,

title = "Arguing about the existence of conflicts",

abstract = "In this paper we formalise a meta-argumentation framework as an ASPIC+ extension which enables reasoning about conflicts between formulae of the argumentation language. The result is a standard abstract argumentation framework that can be evaluated via grounded semantics.",

keywords = "ASPIC+, argumentation, meta-Argumentation",

author = "Giuseppe Pisano and Roberta Calegari and Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sartor",

note = "Funding Information: 1Research partially supported by the “CompuLaw” project, funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union{\textquoteright}s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 833647). 2Corresponding Author: Giuseppe Pisano; E-mail: [email protected]. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.",

year = "2022",

month = sep,

day = "7",

doi = "10.3233/FAIA220160",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-64368-306-5",

series = " Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",

publisher = "IOS Press",

pages = "284--295",

editor = "Francesca Toni and Polberg, {Sylwia } and Booth, {Richard } and Caminada, {Martin } and Kido, {Hiroyuki }",

booktitle = "Computational Models of Argument",

address = "Netherlands",

}

Arguing about the existence of conflicts. / Pisano, Giuseppe; Calegari, Roberta; Prakken, Henry et al.
Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2022. ed. / Francesca Toni; Sylwia Polberg; Richard Booth; Martin Caminada; Hiroyuki Kido. IOS Press, 2022. p. 284-295 ( Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 353).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Arguing about the existence of conflicts

AU - Pisano, Giuseppe

AU - Calegari, Roberta

AU - Prakken, Henry

AU - Sartor, Giovanni

N1 - Funding Information: 1Research partially supported by the “CompuLaw” project, funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 833647). 2Corresponding Author: Giuseppe Pisano; E-mail: [email protected]. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/9/7

Y1 - 2022/9/7

N2 - In this paper we formalise a meta-argumentation framework as an ASPIC+ extension which enables reasoning about conflicts between formulae of the argumentation language. The result is a standard abstract argumentation framework that can be evaluated via grounded semantics.

AB - In this paper we formalise a meta-argumentation framework as an ASPIC+ extension which enables reasoning about conflicts between formulae of the argumentation language. The result is a standard abstract argumentation framework that can be evaluated via grounded semantics.

KW - ASPIC+

KW - argumentation

KW - meta-Argumentation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139468476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/FAIA220160

DO - 10.3233/FAIA220160

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-64368-306-5

T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

SP - 284

EP - 295

BT - Computational Models of Argument

A2 - Toni, Francesca

A2 - Polberg, Sylwia

A2 - Booth, Richard

A2 - Caminada, Martin

A2 - Kido, Hiroyuki

PB - IOS Press

ER -

Arguing about the existence of conflicts

Abstract

Publication series

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this