Abstract
Do actual and perceived self-enhancement entail differing social impressions (i.e. interpersonal evaluations)? Actual self-enhancement represents unduly positive self-views, as gauged by an objective criterion (in this case, IQ scores), whereas perceived self-enhancement involves the extent to which an individual is seen by informants (i.e. peers or observers) as self-enhancing. In an online survey (N=337), a laboratory experiment (N=75), and a round-robin study (N=183), we tested the effects of actual and perceived intellectual self-enhancement on (informant-rated) emotional stability, social attractiveness, and social influence. Actual self-enhancers were rated as emotionally stable, socially attractive, and socially influential. High perceived self-enhancers were judged as socially influential, whereas low-to-moderate perceived self-enhancers were deemed emotionally stable and socially attractive. Privately entertained, illusory positive (even extreme) self-beliefs confer social benefits, whereas being perceived as self-enhancing buys social influence at the cost of being despised. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 621-633 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | European Journal of Personality |
Volume | 27 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- self-enhancement
- person perception
- likability
- social influence
- emotional stability
- INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
- OPTIMAL MARGIN
- PERSONALITY
- NARCISSISM
- ESTEEM
- BIAS
- ILLUSION
- ACQUAINTANCESHIP
- ADAPTIVENESS
- RELIABILITY