Architectures of intergenerational justice: Human dignity, international law, and duties to future generations

Stephen Riley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article draws attention to the constitutive requirements of intergenerational justice and exposes the limitations of regulative arguments based on international human rights law. Intergenerational justice demands constraining the regulative freedom of the international community, and it is tempting to assume that adequate constraints are already contained within existing treaties including international human rights treaties. In fact, intergenerational justice demands bespoke constitutional norms at the international level, and it demands entrenching constitutional norms. International human rights law per se implies neither of these constitutive propositions and both are problematic in light of the present structure of international law. Nevertheless, a combination of arguments concerning intergenerational justice and the systemic implications of human dignity yield a more constitutive account of human rights and therefore an internal critique of the overall architecture of international law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-290
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Human Rights
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2016

Keywords

  • political science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Architectures of intergenerational justice: Human dignity, international law, and duties to future generations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this