Anxiety and the processing of threat in children: Further examination of the cognitive inhibition hypothesis

Mattijn Morren, Merel Kindt, Marcel van den Hout, Hanneke van Kasteren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The present study examined the cognitive inhibition hypothesis (Kindt, Bierman, & Brosschot, 1997) which asserts that young children lack the ability to inhibit the processing of threat, but develop this with age. To examine this issue, high spider fearful children (N = 170) and low spider fearful children (N = 215) aged 7-11 years were tested by means of an emotional Stroop task. It was hypothesised that a processing bias for spider-related stimuli would be present in all 8- and 9-year-old children. That is, it was expected that responses to spider words would be slower compared to responses to control words. Furthermore, it was hypothesised that this processing bias would decrease with age in low fearful children, whereas it would persist in high fearful children. No support was found for these hypotheses. Instead of the predicted processing bias, data showed the reverse pattern; that is, children responded faster to spider words compared to control words. It is proposed that the reverse bias results from avoidance. More precisely, children may evade the processing of spider stimuli through fast responding.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-142
Number of pages12
JournalBehaviour Change
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anxiety and the processing of threat in children: Further examination of the cognitive inhibition hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this