Abstract
Many believe that moral education can cause moral progress. At first glance, this makes sense. A major goal of moral education is the improvement of the moral beliefs, values and behaviors of young people. Most would also consider all of these improvements to be important instances of moral progress. Moreover, moral education is a form of social learning, and there are good reasons to think that social learning processes shape episodes of progressive moral change. Despite this, we argue that instead of being a cause of moral change, the main effect of moral education is often to provide stability or continuity. In addition, we will argue that even when the conditions are right for moral education to contribute to moral change, it is far from clear that the resulting changes will always, or even most of the time, end up being progressive.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 25-40 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Ethical Theory and Moral Practice |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 15 Dec 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2022.
Funding
Thanks to Peter Königs and Gregor Hochstetter for inviting us to contribute to this special issue. We also thank them, along with the other contributors, and Leon Li, for their helpful comments and questions on an earlier draft of this paper. This research is part of the ERC-funded project “The Enemy of the Good. Towards a Theory of Moral Progress” (grant number: 851043). We are grateful to the ERC for giving us money.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
ERC-funded project "The Enemy of the Good | 851043 |
ERC | |
European Research Council (ERC) | 851043 |
Keywords
- Computer simulation
- Content bias
- Moral education
- Moral progress
- Prestige bias
- Social Learning