TY - JOUR
T1 - Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Fastl, Christina
AU - De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C
AU - Babo Martins, Sara
AU - Sucena Afonso, João
AU - di Bari, Carlotta
AU - Venkateswaran, Narmada
AU - Pires, Sara Monteiro
AU - Mughini-Gras, Lapo
AU - Huntington, Ben
AU - Rushton, Jonathan
AU - Pigott, David
AU - Devleesschauwer, Brecht
PY - 2023/8/14
Y1 - 2023/8/14
N2 - Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the leading global health challenges of the century. Animals and their products are known contributors to the human AMR burden, but the extent of this contribution is not clear. This systematic literature review aimed to identify studies investigating the direct impact of animal sources, defined as livestock, aquaculture, pets, and animal-based food, on human AMR. We searched four scientific databases and identified 31 relevant publications, including 12 risk assessments, 16 source attribution studies, and three other studies. Most studies were published between 2012 and 2022, and most came from Europe and North America, but we also identified five articles from South and South-East Asia. The studies differed in their methodologies, conceptual approaches (bottom-up, top-down, and complex), definitions of the AMR hazard and outcome, the number and type of sources they addressed, and the outcome measures they reported. The most frequently addressed animal source was chicken, followed by cattle and pigs. Most studies investigated bacteria-resistance combinations. Overall, studies on the direct contribution of animal sources of AMR are rare but increasing. More recent publications tailor their methodologies increasingly towards the AMR hazard as a whole, providing grounds for future research to build on.
AB - Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the leading global health challenges of the century. Animals and their products are known contributors to the human AMR burden, but the extent of this contribution is not clear. This systematic literature review aimed to identify studies investigating the direct impact of animal sources, defined as livestock, aquaculture, pets, and animal-based food, on human AMR. We searched four scientific databases and identified 31 relevant publications, including 12 risk assessments, 16 source attribution studies, and three other studies. Most studies were published between 2012 and 2022, and most came from Europe and North America, but we also identified five articles from South and South-East Asia. The studies differed in their methodologies, conceptual approaches (bottom-up, top-down, and complex), definitions of the AMR hazard and outcome, the number and type of sources they addressed, and the outcome measures they reported. The most frequently addressed animal source was chicken, followed by cattle and pigs. Most studies investigated bacteria-resistance combinations. Overall, studies on the direct contribution of animal sources of AMR are rare but increasing. More recent publications tailor their methodologies increasingly towards the AMR hazard as a whole, providing grounds for future research to build on.
KW - Humans
KW - Animals
KW - Cattle
KW - Swine
KW - Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
KW - Drug Resistance, Bacterial
KW - Bacteria
KW - Bacterial Infections/epidemiology
KW - Anti-Infective Agents
KW - Chickens
U2 - 10.1017/S0950268823001309
DO - 10.1017/S0950268823001309
M3 - Article
C2 - 37577944
SN - 0950-2688
VL - 151
SP - 1
EP - 13
JO - Epidemiology and Infection
JF - Epidemiology and Infection
M1 - e143
ER -