Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analysis and Comparison of Natural Shear and Induced Tensile Fractures for Caprock Leakage Assessment

  • Sahyuo Achuo Dze*
  • , Tomos Phillips
  • , Reza Najafi-Silab
  • , Sarah Perez
  • , Tom Bultreys
  • , Vladimir Novak
  • , Christian M. Schlepütz
  • , Veerle Cnudde
  • , Florian Doster
  • , Kamaljit Singh
  • , Kevin Bisdom
  • , Andreas Busch
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Heriot-Watt University
  • Ghent University
  • Paul Scherrer Institute
  • Royal Dutch Shell PLC

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The comparison between laboratory-induced and subsurface fractures, and their corresponding flow is still unclear. Here, we examine three natural shear fractures and two induced tensile fractures from the same low-permeability lithology. Using high-resolution synchrotron imaging, we extracted three-dimensional fracture void geometries to analyse aperture distributions, surface roughness, and spatial correlation patterns. We then compared measured fracture transmissivities against theoretical predictions from parallel-plate models (cubic law) and direct numerical simulations (DNS) of flow to evaluate consistency and uncertainties. We find that despite differences in heterogeneity, induced tensile and natural shear fractures can generally yield similar flow in caprocks. Our comparisons further indicate that the choice of flow estimation method can introduce more uncertainty than the fracture opening mode.

Original languageEnglish
Article number29
Number of pages26
JournalTransport in Porous Media
Volume153
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.

Keywords

  • Caprock
  • Fracture flow
  • Heterogeneity
  • Shear
  • Simulation
  • Tensile

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis and Comparison of Natural Shear and Induced Tensile Fractures for Caprock Leakage Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this