Abstract
Dan Svantesson is quickly establishing himself as a leading voice in the field of jurisdiction. Coming to this
field from Internet and data protection law, he is surely well placed to criticize the current legal framework of
international jurisdiction in light of technological evolution, which has made territoriality lose its salience as the
cornerstone of jurisdiction. I myself have recently been characterized as one of the border guards of territoriality,1
on the basis of my earlier monograph on Jurisdiction in International Law.
2 Accordingly, the informed
reader might believe that I will severely criticize as iconoclastic such a proposal as Svantesson’s, namely doing
away with territoriality as the very linchpin of jurisdiction. As it happens, however, I largely concur with Svantesson’s
ideas, at least to the extent they apply to cross-border transactions via the Internet. In this contribution, I
argue that the reality of a de-territorialized Internet necessitates jurisdictional rethinking, but that this rethinking
in fact heavily relies on previous scholarship, predating the Internet era. The advent of the current era, however,
has lent particular urgency to those earlier proposals.
field from Internet and data protection law, he is surely well placed to criticize the current legal framework of
international jurisdiction in light of technological evolution, which has made territoriality lose its salience as the
cornerstone of jurisdiction. I myself have recently been characterized as one of the border guards of territoriality,1
on the basis of my earlier monograph on Jurisdiction in International Law.
2 Accordingly, the informed
reader might believe that I will severely criticize as iconoclastic such a proposal as Svantesson’s, namely doing
away with territoriality as the very linchpin of jurisdiction. As it happens, however, I largely concur with Svantesson’s
ideas, at least to the extent they apply to cross-border transactions via the Internet. In this contribution, I
argue that the reality of a de-territorialized Internet necessitates jurisdictional rethinking, but that this rethinking
in fact heavily relies on previous scholarship, predating the Internet era. The advent of the current era, however,
has lent particular urgency to those earlier proposals.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 81-85 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | AJIL Unbound |
Volume | 109 |
Publication status | Published - 3 Nov 2015 |