Abstract
In the process of proof alternative stories that explain 'what happened' in a case are tested using arguments based on evidence. Building on the author's earlier hybrid theory, this paper presents a formal theory that combines causal stories and evidential arguments, further integrating the different types of reasoning in a framework for structured argumentation. This then allows for correct reasoning with causal and evidential rules, and further integrates arguments and stories by grounding them both in well-known dialectical argumentation semantics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
Pages | 13-22 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-4503-3522-5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |