An experimental study of charity hazard: The effect of risky and ambiguous government compensation on flood insurance demand

Peter John Robinson, W.J.W. Botzen, F. Zhou

Research output: Working paperAcademic

Abstract

This paper examines the problem of “charity hazard”, which is the crowding out of private insurance demand by government compensation. In the context of flood insurance and disaster financing, charity hazard is particularly worrisome given current trends of increasing flood risks as a result of climate change and more people choosing to locate in high-risk areas. We conduct an experimental analysis of the influence on flood insurance demand of risk and ambiguity preferences and the availability of different forms of government compensation for disaster damage. Certain and risky government compensation crowd out demand, confirming charity hazard, but this is not observed for ambiguous compensation. Ambiguity averse subjects have higher insurance demand when government compensation is ambiguous relative to risky. Policy recommendations are discussed to overcome charity hazard
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUSE Research Institute
Number of pages65
Volume19
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Publication series

NameUSE Working Paper series
No.19
Volume19
ISSN (Electronic)2666-8238

Keywords

  • Ambiguity preferences
  • charity hazard;
  • economic experiment;
  • flood insurance demand
  • risk preferences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An experimental study of charity hazard: The effect of risky and ambiguous government compensation on flood insurance demand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this