Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Air pollution, greenspace, and metabolic syndrome in older Czech and Swiss populations

  • Andrea Dalecká
  • , Ayoung Jeong
  • , Daniel Szabó
  • , Balint Tamasi
  • , Medea Imboden
  • , Emmanuel Schaffner
  • , Dirk Keidel
  • , Youchen Shen
  • , Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
  • , Marta Cirach
  • , Kees de Hoogh
  • , Jelle Vlaanderen
  • , Roel Vermeulen
  • , Annette Peters
  • , Erik Melén
  • , Anne Peasey
  • , Martin Bobák
  • , Hynek Pikhart
  • , Nicole Probst-Hensch*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Masaryk University
  • Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
  • ISGlobal Institute de Salut Global Barcelona
  • University of Basel
  • Institute of Epidemiology II
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • University College London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) has increased rapidly, with considerable variation between European countries. The study examined the relationship between air pollutants, greenspace, and MetS and its components in the Czech and Swiss populations.

METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the Czech Health, Alcohol and Psychosocial Factors in Eastern Europe (HAPIEE) (n = 4,931) and the Swiss cohort Study on Air Pollution and Lung and Heart Diseases in Adults (SAPALDIA) (n = 4,422) cohorts included participants aged 44-73 years. MetS was defined as abdominal obesity plus two additional components (hypertension, diabetes, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and elevated triglycerides). Annual mean concentrations of PM 10, PM 2.5, NO 2, and greenspace (defined as the annual mean of normalized difference vegetation index within 500 m) were assigned to the individual residential level. We estimated odds ratios (OR) using multivariable logistic regressions with cluster-robust standard error, controlling for multiple confounders.

RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS was significantly higher in the Czech (51.1%) compared with Swiss (35.8%) population as were the concentration means of PM 10 and PM 2.5. In HAPIEE, a 5 μg/m 3 increase in PM 2.5 was associated with 14% higher odds of MetS (OR = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.28). In SAPALDIA, no evidence was found for the associations between air pollutants and MetS (e.g. OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.90, 1.13 for PM 2.5). No protective effects of normalized difference vegetation index on MetS were observed. Upon inspection of MetS components, PM 2.5 and PM 10 exposures were associated with higher odds of hypertension and elevated triglycerides in HAPIEE only, while PM 2.5, PM 10, and NO 2 were associated with higher odds of diabetes in SAPALDIA only.

CONCLUSION: Individuals with higher exposures to PM 2.5 may be at higher risk of MetS. The differential associations with MetS components between the cohorts deserve further investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e393
JournalEnvironmental Epidemiology
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The Environmental Epidemiology. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • Cross-sectional design
  • Greenspace
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Particulate matter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Air pollution, greenspace, and metabolic syndrome in older Czech and Swiss populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this