Air pollution and human fertility rates

Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen*, Xavier Basagaña, Payam Dadvand, David Martinez, Marta Cirach, Rob Beelen, Bénédicte Jacquemin

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Some reports have suggested effects of air pollution on semen quality and success rates of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in humans and lower fertility rates in mice. However, no studies have evaluated the impact of air pollution on human fertility rates. Aims: We assessed the association between traffic related air pollution and fertility rates in humans in Barcelona, Spain (2011-2012). We hypothesized that higher air pollution levels would be associated with lower fertility rates. Methods: We calculated the general fertility rate which is the number of live births per 1000 women between the ages of 15 and 44years per census tract. We used land use regression (LUR) modeling to estimate the air pollution concentrations (particulate matter, NO2/NOx) per census tract. We used Besag-York-Mollié models to quantify the relationship between air pollution and fertility rates with adjustment for a number of potential confounders such as maternal age and area level socio-economic status. Results: We found a statistically significant reduction of fertility rates with an increase in traffic related air pollution levels, particularly for the coarse fraction of particulate matter (IRR. = 0.87 95% CI 0.82, 0.94 per IQR). Conclusion: This is the first study in humans to show an association between reduced fertility rates and higher traffic related air pollution levels.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)9-14
    Number of pages6
    JournalEnvironment international
    Volume70
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

    Keywords

    • Air pollution
    • Epidemiology
    • Fertility
    • Infertility

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Air pollution and human fertility rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this