Aiming at the top: Upward social comparison of abilities after failure

Jan F Ybema, Bram P. Buunk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study examined the effects of feedback on a task on information seeking and partner preferences as forms of social comparison. It was predicted that subjects who experienced failure and perceived control over future performance would, for reasons of self-improvement, choose more strongly upward a comparison other than subjects who experienced success or perceived no control. In the experiment, 121 college students were given either failure, average, or success feedback on a bogus test for either a stable or a controllable ability. Next, the subjects choose a comparison other whose test material they would examine, and a comparison other as a partner for writing an evaluation of the test. As predicted, the preferences for information seeking and affiliation were more strongly upward when subjects experienced failure than when subjects experienced success. Perceived control partly resulted in more strongly upward choices in information seeking for subjects experiencing failure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)627-645
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume23
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • PERCEIVED CONTROL
  • AFFILIATION
  • ADJUSTMENT
  • STRESS
  • CHOICE
  • THREAT
  • CANCER

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aiming at the top: Upward social comparison of abilities after failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this