Abstract
Invoking the fundamental social right to assistance does not prevent the CRvB from also applying the traditional fundamental right to freedom of religion. This approach is in line with the current case-law of the ECHR. This also applies to the more subjective explanation of religion used by the CRvB. This can be justified by the doctrine of interpretative restraint and the importance of self-definition. In the light of these principles, it is unclear why the CRvB makes a distinction in the level of protection of different religious expressions when weighing up interests in the context of article 9 ECHR
Original language | Dutch |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 33-46 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Tijdschrift voor religie, recht en beleid |
Volume | 2019 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Reikwijdte godsdienstvrijheid
- sociaal grondrecht
- Bijstand
- sociale voorzieningen
- islamitische geloofsuitingen