TY - JOUR
T1 - Addressing the circularity and sustainability of different single-use and reusable crates used for fresh fruit and vegetables packaging
AU - Rasines, Laura
AU - San Miguel, Guillermo
AU - Corona, Blanca
AU - Aguayo, Encarna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - This study assesses the sustainability of single-use (cardboard and wooden) crates and reusable plastic crates (RPC) from three perspective life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC) and circular indicators: Material Circular Indicator (MCI), Material Reutilisation Score (MRS), and Circular Index (CI). A cradle-to-grave life cycle approach was applied to transporting 1 kg of fresh fruit or vegetables to the retailer point. The base case assumed single use for cardboard and wooden crates and 140 rotations for RPC. An optimised scenario was also assessed for RPC, assuming full recycling at its end-of-life. LCA, LCC, and circular indicators (MCI and CI) results indicated that RPC was the most sustainable and circular packaging. Increasing RPC recyclability to 100 % improved circularity scores, however its environmental impact slight increased. These results reflect that the food industry should adopt RPC use because of their higher economic, environmental performance, and circularity.
AB - This study assesses the sustainability of single-use (cardboard and wooden) crates and reusable plastic crates (RPC) from three perspective life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC) and circular indicators: Material Circular Indicator (MCI), Material Reutilisation Score (MRS), and Circular Index (CI). A cradle-to-grave life cycle approach was applied to transporting 1 kg of fresh fruit or vegetables to the retailer point. The base case assumed single use for cardboard and wooden crates and 140 rotations for RPC. An optimised scenario was also assessed for RPC, assuming full recycling at its end-of-life. LCA, LCC, and circular indicators (MCI and CI) results indicated that RPC was the most sustainable and circular packaging. Increasing RPC recyclability to 100 % improved circularity scores, however its environmental impact slight increased. These results reflect that the food industry should adopt RPC use because of their higher economic, environmental performance, and circularity.
KW - Circular economy
KW - Circularity indicator
KW - Life Cycle Assessment
KW - Life Cycle Costing
KW - Micro scale
KW - Packaging waste
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208680556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fpsl.2024.101391
DO - 10.1016/j.fpsl.2024.101391
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85208680556
SN - 2214-2894
VL - 46
JO - Food Packaging and Shelf Life
JF - Food Packaging and Shelf Life
M1 - 101391
ER -