Abstract
In this paper we examine how UK police officers investigating domestic violence (DV) make a formal written case to Crown Prosecutors. Using rarely accessed ‘management guidance’ reports (MG3 forms) we analyse how police officers’ written contributions appeal to relevance and how they can ‘nudge’ prosecutors towards particular methods of case disposal, specically, the ‘Simple Caution’. We propose that linguistic strategies can reduce the likelihood of convictions, and we raise serious concerns about the impact of police officers’ institutional ‘retellings’ in the pursuit of justice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 118-138 |
| Journal | Language and Law |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Ear witness
- eye witness
- speaker recognition
- forensic speaker identication
- forensic voice comparison
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Additions, Omissions, and Transformations in Institutional 'Retellings' of Domestic Violence cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver