Abstract
This chapter will examine the key players in the decision-making process for pre-trial detention (PTD), specifically judges, prosecutors, defence lawyers and the probation service. It notes that prosecutors play a critical role in these decisions and can be highly influential. This indicates the need for any strategies to reduce PTD to work closely with prosecutors. The chapter also explores the challenges faced by defence lawyers, such as having sufficient time to prepare for the proceedings, being able to suggest alternatives to PTD and the availability of resources such as funded legal assistance. It examines the relative positions and influences of these actors, and the legal and social cultures that surround them. Some countries represented in this volume have a role for the probation service in decision-making, the chapter will also assess how this role operates in practice, and the barriers faced.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | European Perspectives on Pre-Trial Detention |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Means of Last Resort? |
| Editors | C. Morgenstern, W. Hammerschick, M. Rogan |
| Place of Publication | Abingdon |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Chapter | 11 |
| Pages | 200-213 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781000953091 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780367747268 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Publication series
| Name | Frontiers of Criminal Justice |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Routledge |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 selection and editorial matter, Christine Morgenstern, Walter Hammerschick and Mary Rogan; individual chapters, the contributors.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Comparative criminal law
- pre-trial detention
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Actors, roles and responsibilities in the pre-trial detention decision-making process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Pre-trial detention in the Netherlands: absolutely low, relatively high
Lindeman, J., Jacobs, P. & Boone, M., Jan 2024, European Perspectives on Pre-Trial Detention: A Means Of Last Resort?. Morgenstern, C., Hammerschick, W. & Rogan, M. (eds.). Abingdon: Routledge, p. 142-164 23 p. (Frontiers of Criminal Justice).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
DETOUR - Naar voorlopige hechtenis als ultima ratio: Vergelijkend rapport
Hammerschick, W., Morgenstern, C., Bikelis, S., Boone, M. M., Durnescu, I., Jonckheere, A., Lindeman, J. M. W., Maes, E. & Rogan, M., Feb 2018, Vienna: Institute for the Sociology of Law and Criminology. 88 p.Research output: Book/Report › Report › Academic
Open AccessFile -
DETOUR - Towards Pre-trial Detention as Ultima Ratio: Comparative Report
Hammerschick, W., Morgenstern, C., Bikelis, S., Boone, M. M., Durnescu, I., Jonckheere, A., Lindeman, J. M. W., Maes, E. & Rogan, M., Feb 2018, Vienna: Institute for the Sociology of Law and Criminology. 81 p.Research output: Book/Report › Report › Academic
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver