Acceptability of doxycycline prophylaxis, prior antibiotic use, and knowledge of antimicrobial resistance among Australian gay and bisexual men and non-binary people

  • Martin Holt*
  • , Benjamin R. Bavinton
  • , Sarah K. Calabrese
  • , Timothy R. Broady
  • , Shawn Clackett
  • , Vincent J. Cornelisse
  • , Simin Yu
  • , Tina Gordon
  • , Dash Heath-Paynter
  • , John B.F. De Wit
  • , James MacGibbon
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: There is growing interest in novel sexually transmissible infection (STI) prevention strategies, including doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP). We assessed interest in doxy-PEP and other STI prevention strategies among gay and bisexual men and nonbinary people in Australia, as well as prior antibiotic use for STI prevention, and knowledge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Methods: We conducted a national, online survey in June to July 2023. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the acceptability of doxy-PEP. Results: Of 2046 participants, 26.9% had been diagnosed with an STI in the previous year. Condoms were rated as an acceptable STI prevention strategy by 45.1% of the sample, STI preexposure prophylaxis by 54.0%, and doxy-PEP by 75.8%. Previous antibiotic use for STI prevention was reported by 7.5% of the sample, and 2.6% were currently using antibiotics for STI prevention. Over half the sample (62.1%) had some knowledge of AMR. Of those who knew something about AMR, 76.2% were concerned about it. Interest in using doxy-PEP was independently associated with previous use of antibiotics for STI prevention (adjusted odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.78–5.35; P < 0.001), whereas those who were concerned about AMR were less interested in it (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.36–0.72; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis was highly acceptable to gay and bisexual men and nonbinary people in Australia, and few factors distinguished between interest in using it or not. We recommend community and professional discussion and education about the effective use of doxy-PEP, AMR, and who would most benefit from doxy-PEP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-80
Number of pages8
JournalSexually Transmitted Diseases
Volume52
Issue number2
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Funding

Sources of support: The PrEPARE Project is supported by project funding from the BBV and STI Research Intervention and Strategic Evaluation program of the New South Wales Ministry of Health, and surveillance funding from the Australian Government Department of Health. The Centre for Social Research in Health, Health Equity Matters and the Kirby Institute are supported by funding from the Australian Government Department of Health. Benjamin Bavinton is supported by an Investigator Grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council. Sarah Calabrese was supported by a Fulbright Future Scholarship. Simin Yu is supported by a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council and UNSW. No pharmaceutical funding was received for this research.

Funders
Fulbright Future Scholarship
Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government
NSW Ministry of Health
National Health and Medical Research Council
China Scholarship Council
University of New South Wales

    Keywords

    • antimicrobial drug resistance
    • post exposure prophylaxis
    • prevention
    • sexual and gender minorities
    • sexually transmitted diseases

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Acceptability of doxycycline prophylaxis, prior antibiotic use, and knowledge of antimicrobial resistance among Australian gay and bisexual men and non-binary people'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this